1999 MCC Smart vs. 1985 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 970 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 MCC Smart (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 MCC Smart (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 1985 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | MCC | Suzuki |
Model | Smart | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1985 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2040 mm |