1999 MCC Smart vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 380 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1999 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 799 cc | 1451 cc |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1910 mm |