1999 MCC Smart vs. 1994 Renault Ludo
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Renault Ludo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Renault Ludo would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Renault Ludo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Renault Ludo weights approximately 315 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Renault Ludo (107 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm). This means 1994 Renault Ludo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 MCC Smart | 1994 Renault Ludo | |
| Make | MCC | Renault |
| Model | Smart | Ludo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1870 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1015 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2750 mm |
