1999 MCC Smart vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Nissan CQ-X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan CQ-X weights approximately 152 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan CQ-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 MCC Smart | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | CQ-X |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 852 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2530 mm |
