1999 MCC Smart vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 506 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Smart | Lancer |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2510 mm |