1999 MCC Smart vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota RunX weights approximately 410 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 MCC Smart | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | RunX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2610 mm |
