1999 MCC Smart vs. 2009 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2009 Nissan Micra is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Micra weights approximately 290 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Micra (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 MCC Smart | 2009 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Micra |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 700 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2440 mm |
