1999 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 MCC Smart | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | MCC | Volvo |
| Model | Smart | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 799 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 3.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 3.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 70 L |
