1999 MCC Smart vs. 2013 Mazda 5
To start off, 2013 Mazda 5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 5 weights approximately 831 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 5 (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart. 1999 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 MCC Smart | 2013 Mazda 5 | |
Make | MCC | Mazda |
Model | Smart | 5 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 799 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 1551 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 3.2 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 3.8 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 60 L |