1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura TL would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (403 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1998 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura TL.
Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 has manual transmission. 1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercedes-Benz C 112 | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Acura |
Model | C 112 | TL |
Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5987 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 403 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2840 mm |