1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 245 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1952 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
Model | CLK | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4266 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3160 mm |