1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 255 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | CLK | RM A |
Year Released | 1999 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2870 mm |