1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 30 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | Outlander |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |