1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. Both 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2005 Renault Megane are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 200 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK.

Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK (185 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (101 Nm). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane. 2005 Renault Megane has automatic transmission and 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK has manual transmission. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Megane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: