1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. Both 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK and 2013 Mazda CX-5 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK (161 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 198 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK (234 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK has manual transmission. 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mazda |
| Model | SLK | CX-5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 234 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 56 L |
