1999 Mercury Cougar vs. 1960 MG Magnett

To start off, 1999 Mercury Cougar is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 2,530 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Cougar (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 204 kg more than 1960 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Cougar (223 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.

Compare all specifications: