1999 Mercury Cougar vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1999 Mercury Cougar is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 476 kg more than 1999 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mercury Cougar | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mercury | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cougar | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2530 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 60 L |
