1999 Mercury Cougar vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,530 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Cougar (168 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Cougar (223 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercury Cougar | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mercury | Toyota |
Model | Cougar | Camry |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2530 cc | 2360 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.4 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 70 L |