1999 Mercury Cougar vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,530 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1999 Mercury Cougar. (168 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1999 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 31 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercury Cougar | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mercury | Acura |
Model | Cougar | CSX |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2530 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1344 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |