1999 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW X6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 1013 kg more than 1999 Mercury Sable.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercury Sable | 2010 BMW X6 | |
Make | Mercury | BMW |
Model | Sable | X6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 480 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1602 kg | 2615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4879 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1689 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2934 mm |