1999 Mercury Villager vs. 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 1999 Mercury Villager is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mercury Villager | 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
| Make | Mercury | Cadillac |
| Model | Villager | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3276 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 169 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3300 mm |
