1999 Mercury Villager vs. 1992 Renault 19

To start off, 1999 Mercury Villager is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault 19. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault 19 would be higher. At 3,276 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Villager (169 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1992 Renault 19. (87 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Villager weights approximately 660 kg more than 1992 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (181 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19. 1999 Mercury Villager has automatic transmission and 1992 Renault 19 has manual transmission. 1992 Renault 19 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mercury Villager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: