1999 Mercury Villager vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 3,276 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Villager (169 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Villager (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Mercury Villager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mercury Villager | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mercury | Toyota |
Model | Villager | Camry |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3276 cc | 2360 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2730 mm |