1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Reliant |
| Model | GTO | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2290 mm |
