1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1975 Volvo 260
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 260.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 260. (218 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 260. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1975 Volvo 260 has manual transmission. 1975 Volvo 260 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1975 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | GTO | 260 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |
