1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 132. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1978 Zastava 132 has manual transmission. 1978 Zastava 132 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Zastava |
| Model | GTO | 132 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2560 mm |
