1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1980 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki Cervo.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki Cervo. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1980 Suzuki Cervo has manual transmission. 1980 Suzuki Cervo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1980 Suzuki Cervo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Suzuki |
| Model | GTO | Cervo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2040 mm |
