1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1982 Reliant SE6
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1982 Reliant SE6. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1982 Reliant SE6.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Reliant SE6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Reliant SE6. (233 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Reliant SE6. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1982 Reliant SE6 has manual transmission. 1982 Reliant SE6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1982 Reliant SE6 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Reliant |
Model | GTO | SE6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 426 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |