1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1982 Talbot 1510
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1982 Talbot 1510. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot 1510.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Talbot 1510. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot 1510. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1982 Talbot 1510 has manual transmission. 1982 Talbot 1510 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1982 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Talbot |
Model | GTO | 1510 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 426 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |