1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (150 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (249 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | GTO | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 249 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2720 mm |
