1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi GTO would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (426 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | GTO | Commander |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 5652 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 322 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2790 mm |
