1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi GTO would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac STS. (368 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | GTO | STS |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 426 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2957 mm |
