1999 Mitsubishi GTO vs. 2012 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Charger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi GTO would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Charger (370 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Charger (535 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO. (426 Nm). This means 2012 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi GTO.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi GTO | 2012 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | GTO | Charger |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 426 Nm | 535 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3053 mm |