1999 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi L 200. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi L 200.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 has manual transmission. 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi L 200 | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | L 200 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1999 | 1990 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2477 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4690 mm |