1999 Mitsubishi L 200 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi L 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 (100 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 (245 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi L 200 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | L 200 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2477 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2525 mm |
