1999 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (373 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Wrangler. (352 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | Lancer | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 1 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2946 mm |