1999 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 25 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi Minica | 2006 Rover 25 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Minica | 25 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 655 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2510 mm |