1999 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1102 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi Minica | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Minica | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 655 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 323 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1812 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2852 mm |
