1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,848 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Space Runner | 265 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2349 cc | 2848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
