1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Space Runner | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2349 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |