1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 114 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 605 kg more than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Because 1981 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Toyota Celica. (197 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | SUW | Celica |
Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 61 L |