1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,835 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 95 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger (320 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
Model | SUW | Challenger |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1810 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2730 mm |