1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 1996 Volvo S40

To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Volvo S40. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 675 kg more than 1996 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo S40. (177 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo S40. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo S40 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo S40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: