1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 470 kg more than 2003 Volvo S40.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (321 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | SUW | S40 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1435 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |
