1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 1,785 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 805 kg more than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | SUW | Celica |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 1785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |
