1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2008 Rover 25

To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 775 kg more than 2008 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 2008 Rover 25 has manual transmission. 2008 Rover 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: