1999 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 575 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
| Model | SUW | SRX |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 304 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 2480 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |
