1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 1966 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1966 Volvo P 1800. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo P 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 174 kg more than 1966 Volvo P 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 1966 Volvo P 1800 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | C 52 | P 1800 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1092 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
