1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 101 kg more than 1996 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (148 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan C 52 | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | C 52 | Megane |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 354 Nm | 148 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2470 mm |