1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 1996 Renault Safrane
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Safrane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Safrane would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 Renault Safrane. (141 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Safrane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Safrane weights approximately 259 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Safrane. (200 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Safrane. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Safrane has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Safrane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan C 52 | 1996 Renault Safrane | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | C 52 | Safrane |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1525 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2770 mm |
